Problems of Participation Qualification and Sentencing Proportionality in Unlicensed Mineral Mining Offences

Authors

  • Revaldo Revaldo Universitas Bangka Belitung
  • Jeanne Darc Noviayanti Manik Universitas Bangka Belitung
  • Sintong Arion Hutapea Universitas Bangka Belitung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59525/rechtsvinding.1436

Keywords:

Deelneming, Medeplege, Doenpleger, Mining Crime, Double Opzet

Abstract

Unlicensed tin sand mining activities in East Belitung frequently involve multiple perpetrators with varying roles and degrees of participation. This situation demands the careful application of the participation doctrine (deelneming) to ensure that criminal sentences proportionally reflect each actor's culpability. This study analyzes the accuracy of the deelneming doctrine and the judicial reasoning underlying sentencing in Verdict No. 48/Pid.Sus-LH/2025/PN Tdn and Verdict No. 49/Pid.Sus-LH/2025/PN Tdn. The research employs a normative legal method with a descriptive-analytical character using case, statutory, and conceptual approaches. Findings reveal that prosecutors and judges both applied Article 55 paragraph (1) point 1 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 161 of Law No. 3 of 2020, albeit from different perspectives. The co-perpetrator (medepleger) classification for truck drivers in Verdict No. 48 is inaccurate given the absence of double opzet and meeting of minds. Conversely, the medepleger classification of the tin collector in Verdict No. 49 is correct. Sentencing in both verdicts does not fully reflect the proportional difference in culpability, leaving the legal objectives of justice, utility, and legal certainty insufficiently balanced.

References

Ananda, A. I., Muspira, & Gupran, Y. (2023). Analisis Penyertaan (Deelneming) Dalam Tindak Pidana. Jurnal Syariah Hukum Islam, 6(2).

Basri, M., Ayu, S. N., Nabilla, G., & Berutu, S. L. (2024). Background to the Arrival of the Dutch, VOC, Dutch East Indies. EDUCTUM: Journal Research, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.56495/ejr.v3i1.443

Disemadi, H. S. (2022). Lenses of Legal Research: A Descriptive Essay on Legal Research Methodologies. Journal of Judicial Review, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v24i2.7280

Firdaus, M. B. (2025). Dialektika Keadilan, Kepastian, Kemanfaatan Hukum dalam Perspektif Gustav Radbruch pada Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik, 3(1).

Laode, R. T., Satyadharma, M., Cahyaniza, Wirayanti, P., & Hado. (2025). Analysis of Management of Supervision and Law Enforcement of Public Goods Transportation in Regency of North Kolaka. Synergy: Journal of Governance and Public Policy (SJGP), 1(1), 20–29.

Maldonado, F. L. M., Yánez, K. A. Y., & Salgado, J. D. M. (2021). An approximation to the legal research methodology. Revista Pedagogia Universitaria y Didactica Del Derecho, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-5885.2021.60341

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2020). Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Pengusahaan Tambang Mineral Batubara. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, (036360).

Poddar, D. (2025). Genealogy of Legal Research Methodology. Asian Journal of Legal Education, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/23220058251321027

Pratiwi, S. (2022). Delik Penyertaan Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Binamulia Hukum, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v11i1.677

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tanjungpandan Nomor 48/Pid.Sus-LH/2025/PN Tdn, Pengadilan Negeri Tanjungpandan (2025).

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tanjungpandan Nomor 49/Pid.Sus-LH/2025/PN Tdn, Pengadilan Negeri Tanjungpandan (2025).

Ramadhan, M. F. A. (2021). Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Bagi Pelaku yang Diduga Turut Melakukan (Medepleger) dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Kasus Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Putusan Nomor: 22/PID.SUS-TPK/2020/PN.JKT.PST. Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 4(2).

Ramadhan, M. F. A., Ardini, A., Pakpahan, K., Pakpahan, M. E., & Aritonang, Z. R. (2025). Corporation as a Co-Perpetrator (Medepleger): A Criminal Law Perspective on Collective-Based Corporate Crimes in Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-531-7_11

Redi, A. (2016). Dilema Penegakan Hukum Penambangan Mineral dan Batubara Tanpa Izin Pada Pertambangan Skala Kecil. Jurnal RechtsVinding, 5(3).

Reidy, D. A. (2023). Rawls, John: The Argument for the Two Principles of Justice. In Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1_847

Saraswaty, K. (2024). Teori Turut Serta Melakukan (Medeplegen) Pejabat Pemerintah Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Bantuan Sosial. Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v6i6.1057

Sinurat, A. (2025). Proporsionalitas Pemidanaan Oleh Hakim Di Indonesia Dalam Putusan Pembunuhan. Jurnal Darma Agung, 33(2).

Soren, C. (2021). Legal Research Methodology: An Overview. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), 8(October).

Sucipto, M. J. B. (2025). The Legal Status of the Fetus in IVF Technology: A Bioethical and Reproductive Health Law Perspective. Synergy: Journal of Governance and Public Policy (SJGP) , 1(1), 1–11.

Sulista, S. (2019). Tambang inkonvensional: Peran masyarakat dan daya tarik ekonomi bagi penambang. Jurnal Teknologi Mineral Dan Batubara, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.30556/jtmb.vol15.no1.2019.348

Wagian, D. (2015). Pembaharuan Hukum Kontrak Dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia. Jurnal IUS, 3(7).

Downloads

Published

2026-03-02

How to Cite

Revaldo, R., Manik, J. D. N., & Hutapea, S. A. (2026). Problems of Participation Qualification and Sentencing Proportionality in Unlicensed Mineral Mining Offences. Rechtsvinding, 4(1), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.59525/rechtsvinding.1436

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.